• Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap
Ommcom News
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • Odisha Special
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • Odisha Special
No Result
View All Result
Odisha News, Odisha Breaking News, Odisha Latest News || Ommcom News
Home Nation

2020 Delhi Riots: Court Frames Attempt To Murder Charges Against Ex-Congress Councillor Ishrat Jahan, Others

OMMCOM NEWS by OMMCOM NEWS
January 20, 2024
in Nation

New Delhi: A court in the national capital has framed charges of rioting, unlawful assembly and attempt to murder against former Congress councillor Ishrat Jahan and 12 others in connection with the 2020 North-East Delhi riots.

The accused persons comprising Jahan, Khalid Saifi, Vikram Pratap, Samir Ansari, Sabu Ansari, Iqbal Ahmed, Anzaar, Mohd. Ilyas, Mohd. Bilal Saifi, Salim Ahmed, Mohd. Yameen and Sharif Khan, were discharged for offences under specific sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Arms Act.

The court, led by Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat, framed charges for offences like rioting, assault, and attempt to murder under various sections of the IPC.

It noted that there were prima facie grounds to presume the accused’s involvement in the alleged offences.

The accused persons were charged for their alleged involvement in riotous activities, obstructing public servants, and attempting to cause harm to deter them from their duties during the riots.

The court observed that public witnesses mentioned the unlawful assembly, instigation by Jahan and Saifi, and violence against the police despite requests to disperse.

While framing charges, the court considered the statements of the injured head constable and noted the need for further clarification during the trial.

The case involves allegations that the accused, including ahan and Saifi, participated in a protest during the riots, refusing to abide by police orders to disperse.

The court discharged them under specific sections of the Arms Act, citing the prosecution’s claim that a juvenile possessed the firearm used in the incident.

 (IANS)

ShareTweetSendSharePinShareSend
Previous Post

Bargarh Dhanu Yatra: Minister Rita Sahu Punished For Uttering ‘Jay Jagannath’ At Kansa Darbar

Next Post

Trump Rules Out Indian-American Haley As 2024 Running Mate

Related Posts

Nation

India And Nordic Countries Discuss Ways To Further Strengthen Relations

March 16, 2026
Nation

Varun, Sundar Meet Tamil Nadu CM M.K. Stalin After T20 WC Triumph

March 16, 2026
Nation

Bengal 2026 Polls: Left Front Releases First List Of 192 Candidates

March 16, 2026
Nation

Andhra Pradesh CM Unveils 58-Feet Statue Of Potti Sriramulu In Amaravati

March 16, 2026
Tamil superstar Vijay
Nation

Vijay Aims For CM’s Post, Not Deputy CM Role: Sengottaiyan

March 16, 2026
Nation

Mamata Questions ECI’s Midnight Transfers, Alleges BJP Bias

March 16, 2026
Next Post

Trump Rules Out Indian-American Haley As 2024 Running Mate

Int'l Tourism To Reach Pre-Covid Levels In 2024: UNWTO

Biden Signs Stopgap Measure To Extend Govt Funding Until March

Khimji
OMC
  • Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • Odisha Special

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.