• Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap
Ommcom News
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ
No Result
View All Result
Odisha News, Odisha Breaking News, Odisha Latest News || Ommcom News
Home Nation

2020 Delhi Riots: Court Frames Attempt To Murder Charges Against Ex-Congress Councillor Ishrat Jahan, Others

OMMCOM NEWS by OMMCOM NEWS
January 20, 2024
in Nation

New Delhi: A court in the national capital has framed charges of rioting, unlawful assembly and attempt to murder against former Congress councillor Ishrat Jahan and 12 others in connection with the 2020 North-East Delhi riots.

The accused persons comprising Jahan, Khalid Saifi, Vikram Pratap, Samir Ansari, Sabu Ansari, Iqbal Ahmed, Anzaar, Mohd. Ilyas, Mohd. Bilal Saifi, Salim Ahmed, Mohd. Yameen and Sharif Khan, were discharged for offences under specific sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Arms Act.

The court, led by Additional Sessions Judge Amitabh Rawat, framed charges for offences like rioting, assault, and attempt to murder under various sections of the IPC.

It noted that there were prima facie grounds to presume the accused’s involvement in the alleged offences.

The accused persons were charged for their alleged involvement in riotous activities, obstructing public servants, and attempting to cause harm to deter them from their duties during the riots.

The court observed that public witnesses mentioned the unlawful assembly, instigation by Jahan and Saifi, and violence against the police despite requests to disperse.

While framing charges, the court considered the statements of the injured head constable and noted the need for further clarification during the trial.

The case involves allegations that the accused, including ahan and Saifi, participated in a protest during the riots, refusing to abide by police orders to disperse.

The court discharged them under specific sections of the Arms Act, citing the prosecution’s claim that a juvenile possessed the firearm used in the incident.

 (IANS)

ShareTweetSendSharePinShareSend
Previous Post

Bargarh Dhanu Yatra: Minister Rita Sahu Punished For Uttering ‘Jay Jagannath’ At Kansa Darbar

Next Post

Trump Rules Out Indian-American Haley As 2024 Running Mate

Related Posts

Nation

‘Millions Of Poor Losing Right To Vote’: Sachin Pilot Raises Alarm Over SIR

November 29, 2025
Nation

PM Modi Congratulates ‘Good Friend’ Albanese, Wishes Australian PM ‘Happy Married Life’

November 29, 2025
Nation

Parliament’s Winter Session Gears Up For Fiery Speeches And Heated Arguments

November 29, 2025
Nation

President Droupadi Murmu Hosts Blind Women’s T20 World Cup Winners

November 29, 2025
S. Jaishankar
Nation

Politics Now ‘Trumps’ Economics; Govt Pushing Trade Pacts, ‘Make In India’: EAM Jaishankar

November 29, 2025
Nation

Ramban Disaster Victims To Get 189 New Houses Within 6 Months: J&K L-G

November 29, 2025
Next Post

Trump Rules Out Indian-American Haley As 2024 Running Mate

Int'l Tourism To Reach Pre-Covid Levels In 2024: UNWTO

Biden Signs Stopgap Measure To Extend Govt Funding Until March

Khimji
OMC
  • Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.