New Delhi: As the humanitarian crisis in Gaza enters its second year, Pakistan’s military establishment is facing renewed criticism for what analysts describe as “performative solidarity” with Palestinians.
Despite a series of public statements condemning Israeli aggression and calling for “Muslim unity”, observers argue that these gestures are largely symbolic and fail to reflect any meaningful policy shift.
According to a commentary published by ‘Middle East Monitor’, the timing of these declarations is often conspicuously aligned with moments of heightened global outrage — when images of Palestinian children killed in airstrikes dominate international media, or when ceasefire negotiations are underway. At such junctures, Pakistani officials, particularly from the defence ministry, issue solemn proclamations of support, the article said.
However, critics contend that these statements serve more as political theatre than genuine diplomatic positioning. “The performance is so transparent,” the analysis noted, “that even the clumsiest village drama troupe might blush at its lack of subtlety.”
The deeper issue, according to the analytical article, lies in the entrenched priorities of Pakistan’s military elite. For decades, the generals in Rawalpindi have operated not as defenders of Muslim causes but as strategic actors serving whichever foreign patron secures their privileges.
From dispatching troops to suppress uprisings in Arab states to supporting the US military operations, Pakistan’s armed forces have consistently aligned with power centres that offer financial or diplomatic benefits.
The Palestinian cause, the report suggests, is treated as a rhetorical tool — invoked when domestic sentiment demands a show of empathy, but never pursued with conviction. This mercenary instinct is often cloaked in language about “national interest” or “strategic balance”, but the underlying motive remains institutional self-preservation.
In a striking comparison, the analysis draws parallels between Pakistan’s military structure and Zionist ideology. While publicly condemning Israel’s actions in Gaza, Pakistan’s generals are said to admire the Israeli model of a militarised state where the army dominates policy, controls resources, and thrives on perpetual crisis.
“In their fantasies,” the report states, “Pakistan becomes a Zionist state of South Asia — minus the competence and global clout.”
The critique extends beyond Pakistan. Across the Muslim world, regimes with Islamic credentials have responded to Gaza’s suffering with silence or complicity. Gulf monarchies maintain economic ties with Israel while offering minimal humanitarian aid. Turkey and Egypt, despite vocal condemnations, continue trade and border enforcement that reinforce the siege.
Ultimately, the analysis concludes that true solidarity lies not in official speeches but in grassroots activism. It is civilians — activists, writers, and ordinary citizens — who embody resistance. As Gaza continues to suffer, the gap between rhetoric and reality in Pakistan’s corridors of power remains a source of growing public disillusionment.
(IANS)
