• Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap
Ommcom News
Advertisement
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • Odisha Special
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • Odisha Special
No Result
View All Result
Odisha News, Odisha Breaking News, Odisha Latest News || Ommcom News
Home Nation

SC Reserves Its Verdict On Issue If Sub-Classification Within SCs And STs Quota Permissible

OMMCOM NEWS by OMMCOM NEWS
February 8, 2024
in Nation

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its judgment on the question whether a sub-classification is permissible within the scheduled castes (SCs) and scheduled tribes (STs) for providing benefits of affirmative action.

A 7-judge Constitution Bench headed by CJI D.Y. Chandrachud was hearing a reference arising out of the 2004 judgment in E.V. Chinnaiah vs State of Andhra Pradesh case, which held that the members of the SCs and STs form homogeneous groups incapable of further regrouping or classification.

The bench, also comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, Vikram Nath, Bela M. Trivedi, Pankaj Mithal, Manoj Misra, and Satish Chandra Sharma, was also dealing with an appeal filed by the Punjab government against the ruling of Punjab and Haryana High Court quashing the 2006 Punjab Scheduled Castes and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) Act providing ‘first preference’ to Balmikis and Mazbhi Sikh castes under SC quota.

In 2020, a 5-judge bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra (now retired) opined that E.V. Chinnaiah ruling is required to be revisited by a larger Bench saying that the benefit of reservation is not percolating down to the neediest and poorest of the poor.

The 2004 Chinnaiah judgement had said that to re-group the scheduled castes specified in Presidential Notification issued under Article 341 of the Constitution would tantamount to discrimination in reverse and would attract the wrath of Article 14 of the Constitution.

(IANS)

Tags: Supreme Court
ShareTweetSendSharePinShareSend
Previous Post

ICC U19 Men’s WC: Australia Overcome A Raza Special, Seals Place In Final Against India

Next Post

U’Khand: Violence Breaks Out In Haldwani As ‘Illegally Constructed’ Mosque & Madarsa Razed

Related Posts

Nation

Hydrogen-Powered Train Reflects PM Modi’s Vision For Green Mobility: Piyush Goyal

July 17, 2026
arrest
Nation

Gujarat ATS Arrests 5 More In Suspected JeM Module Case; Accused Linked To Explosive Device Testing

July 17, 2026
Nation

SIT Submits Revised Report In Kerala ADGP Ajith Kumar Case

July 17, 2026
Nation

‘This Is Great, India!’, Says Ex-UNEP Chief Erik Solheim On First Hydrogen Train

July 17, 2026
Prime Minister Narendra Modi
Nation

‘Dream Of India Receiving Its First Hydrogen Train About To Come True’: PM Modi On Historic Launch

July 17, 2026
Nation

Three Schoolchildren Among Four Killed After Train Hits Bus In Bengal’s Murshidabad

July 17, 2026
Next Post

U'Khand: Violence Breaks Out In Haldwani As 'Illegally Constructed' Mosque & Madarsa Razed

Accused In Knife Attack On Jagan Reddy Gets Bail

SC Rejects Bail Plea Filed By Alleged Khalistani Separatist For Involvement In SFJ Case

Khimji
SAI
  • Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • Odisha Special

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.