• Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap
Ommcom News
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ
No Result
View All Result
Odisha News, Odisha Breaking News, Odisha Latest News || Ommcom News
Home Nation

SC Stays Over Rs 800 Crore Penalty Imposed On Beer Companies For Cartelisation

OMMCOM NEWS by OMMCOM NEWS
February 17, 2023
in Nation

New Delhi:  The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which upheld the penalty of Rs 751.83 crore and recovery proceeding imposed on Heineken’s Indian subsidiary i.e., United Breweries Ltd (UBL), by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Dipankar Datta issued the interim stay on a clutch of appeals filed by the companies and some individuals against the NCLAT order that had refused to interfere with the penalty imposed by the CCI in 2021.

In September 2021, the CCI found UBL, SABMiller India Ltd (now renamed Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd.), Carlsberg India Private Ltd, and All India Brewers’ Association guilty of cartelisation in the beer market and had imposed a total penalty of about Rs 862 crore. UBL was directed to pay Rs 751.83 crore.

In December last year, the NCLAT judgment affirmed the CCI order. UB, Carlsberg India and the All India Breweries Association had challenged the NCLAT order passed in December 2022. Trilegal Competition led by Nisha Kaur Uberoi, partner and national head – competition engaged senior advocates Aryama Sundaram and Aditya Sondhi.

The appellant companies before the NCLAT had argued that the CCI’s order was liable to be set aside since it found them guilty only on the basis of their leniency application. The companies contended that a leniency application was to be examined at the time of imposing a penalty, and could not be treated as information for initiation of inquiry.

(IANS)

Tags: Supreme Court
ShareTweetSendSharePinShareSend
Previous Post

Two Militants Killed In Gunfire Amid Attack On Karachi Police Headquarters

Next Post

Jamaat-E-Islami Demands Probe Into Haryana Killings

Related Posts

Nation

From Panchgavya To Biogas: UP’s New Drive For Sustainable Rural Development

August 17, 2025
Nation

Southern Surge, NDA’s Choice Leave INDIA Bloc On Uneven Ground In Vice-Prez Race

August 17, 2025
Nation

C.P. Radhakrishnan: From Tiruppur Roots To NDA’s Vice-Presidential Candidate

August 17, 2025
Nation

NDA Vice President-Nominee Radhakrishnan Expresses Gratitude To PM Modi, Amit Shah, Fadnavis

August 17, 2025
Nation

India Is Expanding Energy Infrastructure In Quest For Self-Reliance: Hardeep Puri

August 17, 2025
Nation

Two Terror Associates Arrested In J&K’s Bandipora

August 17, 2025
Next Post

Jamaat-E-Islami Demands Probe Into Haryana Killings

Rohtak 1997 Twin Blasts: Accused Tunda Acquitted

Nirmala Sitharaman

No Special Category State Status For States: Nirmala Sitharaman

khimji
  • Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.