• Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap
Ommcom News
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ
No Result
View All Result
Odisha News, Odisha Breaking News, Odisha Latest News || Ommcom News
Home Nation

SC Stays Over Rs 800 Crore Penalty Imposed On Beer Companies For Cartelisation

OMMCOM NEWS by OMMCOM NEWS
February 17, 2023
in Nation

New Delhi:  The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which upheld the penalty of Rs 751.83 crore and recovery proceeding imposed on Heineken’s Indian subsidiary i.e., United Breweries Ltd (UBL), by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Dipankar Datta issued the interim stay on a clutch of appeals filed by the companies and some individuals against the NCLAT order that had refused to interfere with the penalty imposed by the CCI in 2021.

In September 2021, the CCI found UBL, SABMiller India Ltd (now renamed Anheuser Busch InBev India Ltd.), Carlsberg India Private Ltd, and All India Brewers’ Association guilty of cartelisation in the beer market and had imposed a total penalty of about Rs 862 crore. UBL was directed to pay Rs 751.83 crore.

In December last year, the NCLAT judgment affirmed the CCI order. UB, Carlsberg India and the All India Breweries Association had challenged the NCLAT order passed in December 2022. Trilegal Competition led by Nisha Kaur Uberoi, partner and national head – competition engaged senior advocates Aryama Sundaram and Aditya Sondhi.

The appellant companies before the NCLAT had argued that the CCI’s order was liable to be set aside since it found them guilty only on the basis of their leniency application. The companies contended that a leniency application was to be examined at the time of imposing a penalty, and could not be treated as information for initiation of inquiry.

(IANS)

Tags: Supreme Court
ShareTweetSendSharePinShareSend
Previous Post

Two Militants Killed In Gunfire Amid Attack On Karachi Police Headquarters

Next Post

Jamaat-E-Islami Demands Probe Into Haryana Killings

Related Posts

Nation

FM Sitharaman Interacts With Students, Staff Of Ramakrishna Mission Ashram School In Meghalaya

July 13, 2025
Enforcement Directorate (ED)
Nation

Can’t Penalise 3rd Parties Who Unknowingly Buy Properties Attached By ED: Appellate Tribunal

July 13, 2025
Nation

Fire On Diesel-Laden Goods Train Doused After Seven Hours, 18 Wagons Gutted

July 13, 2025
Shivraj Singh Chauhan
Nation

Centre Tells States To Take Strict Action Against Those Selling Fake, Poor Quality Fertilisers

July 13, 2025
Teen Girl Missing
Nation

Teen Girl Missing Since July 7, Tripura Police Contact Delhi Cops After CM’s Instruction

July 13, 2025
Nation

ULFA-I Claims Drone Strikes On Its Headquarters In Myanmar, Indian Army Denies

July 13, 2025
Next Post

Jamaat-E-Islami Demands Probe Into Haryana Killings

Rohtak 1997 Twin Blasts: Accused Tunda Acquitted

Nirmala Sitharaman

No Special Category State Status For States: Nirmala Sitharaman

khimji
TPCODL
OMC
  • Feedback
  • RSS Feed
  • Sitemap

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Odisha
  • Nation
  • World
  • Sports
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Videos
  • Science & Tech
  • Photo Gallery
  • ଓଡ଼ିଆରେ ପଢନ୍ତୁ

© 2025 - Ommcom News. All Rights Reserved.